No. 215: Non-GAAP Disclosure Credibility

Jahr: 2026
Typ: Working Paper
Open Science:

Abstract

Managers provide voluntary non-GAAP adjustments alongside GAAP earnings to reveal economic performance that GAAP conservatism otherwise leaves understated. Such disclosure faces a credibility problem: Regulation~G imposes no definitional standard, leaving managers with broad discretion over which items to exclude. Absent external discipline, managers cannot convince investors that they are not inflating performance. I show that when credibility is sustained by institutional discipline that scales with materiality, a partial-pooling equilibrium obtains: managers credibly disclose material adjustments, while withholding immaterial news when credibility is too low to convince investors. In this framework, conservative GAAP and informative non-GAAP earnings are complements: pushing GAAP toward fair value reduces the information content that sustains non-GAAP credibility. Banning non-GAAP without strengthening GAAP or enforcement eliminates the channel through which managers communicate information that conservative GAAP does not recognize.

Beteiligte Institutionen

Die Hauptstandorte vom TRR 266 sind die Universität Paderborn (Sprecherhochschule), die HU Berlin und die Universität Mannheim. Alle drei Standorte sind seit vielen Jahren Zentren für Rechnungswesen- und Steuerforschung. Hinzu kommen Wissenschaftler der LMU München, der Frankfurt School of Finance and Management, der Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, der Universität zu Köln, der Leibniz Universität Hannover und der TU Darmstadt, die die gleiche Forschungsagenda verfolgen.

WordPress Cookie Plugin von Real Cookie Banner