No. 215: Non-GAAP Disclosure Credibility

Year: 2026
Type: Working Paper
Open Science:

Abstract

Managers provide voluntary non-GAAP adjustments alongside GAAP earnings to reveal economic performance that GAAP conservatism otherwise leaves understated. Such disclosure faces a credibility problem: Regulation~G imposes no definitional standard, leaving managers with broad discretion over which items to exclude. Absent external discipline, managers cannot convince investors that they are not inflating performance. I show that when credibility is sustained by institutional discipline that scales with materiality, a partial-pooling equilibrium obtains: managers credibly disclose material adjustments, while withholding immaterial news when credibility is too low to convince investors. In this framework, conservative GAAP and informative non-GAAP earnings are complements: pushing GAAP toward fair value reduces the information content that sustains non-GAAP credibility. Banning non-GAAP without strengthening GAAP or enforcement eliminates the channel through which managers communicate information that conservative GAAP does not recognize.

Participating Institutions

TRR 266‘s main locations are Paderborn University (Coordinating University), HU Berlin, and University of Mannheim. All three locations have been centers for accounting and tax research for many years. They are joined by researchers from LMU Munich, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management, Goethe University Frankfurt, University of Cologne, Leibniz University Hannover and TU Darmstadt who share the same research agenda.

WordPress Cookie Plugin by Real Cookie Banner